Irish film director George Clarke hung up on Youtube a delusion, so that fans caught between the unusual as it was the last hope to believe in something absurd. The man, who organizes film festivals and promotes class B in that Youtube video of some of his films, says he was watching a deluxe edition of the film "The Circus" (1928) of Charles Chaplin when he noticed that one of the scenes that do not appear in the film, but that are in the DVD with pictures cut from the final edit, you see a lady talking on the phone.
On what supports your delusional idea? On the basis that given the fact that women have a hand to his ear. That was enough only for youtube burst and as a nasty virus, the idea is disseminated on websites, blogs and the press, always eager for these things. The explanation, by far the most elaborate of all and the most convoluted, lit because some still imagine that time travel is possible. They say the best proof that time travel was not possible ever the future is that no one has come to visit. Neither the wife of Chaplin's video moved us so much these days. Also, if she speaks on a cellphone, with whom he did? Was there more space travelers? How did he do to get a signal if there were no cell antennas in those years distant?
- What do you think the "debate" that led to the discovery of Clarke?
-arguments, mostly jokingly, I find fascinating. Discuss the possibility without actually taking it seriously, considering the pros and cons, is a fun exercise that mixes entertainment with at least some elements of critical thinking. Certainly not all positive. There are those who end up or accept or reject a possibility based on fallacious argument, becoming a joke in a show of ignorance.
- Do you think it is a maneuver of the Clarke to advertise its film festival and zombie movie?
"In a way, yes. Clarke has in his video that "discovered" this a year ago. Why report it recently? Why start a video showing the films you do? I think that he capitalized on it by the time traveler as a viral marketing maneuver. But I think the fact Likewise, the video has been invented.
- What do you think the best argument? Does the instrument or device for the deaf Siemens?
"Both seem plausible, although strictly speaking a common tool for the deaf is more likely that an electrical device that certainly should be more rare in that era. The videos provide insight to decide for details either.
- Why would a subject like this generates so much appeal?
"One of the earliest works of science fiction was" The Time Machine " de H. G. Wells. Una de las series de ficción en el cine de mayor éxito es “Volver al futuro”. El viaje en el tiempo es una posibilidad que fascina a todos, y con razón.
-¿Qué dificultades tiene, a tu juicio, la idea del viajero del tiempo?
-Supongamos que el viaje en el tiempo sea posible. ¿Qué tipo de evidencia sería necesaria para aceptarla? Por lo pronto, debiera ser una extraordinaria, toda vez que eso revolucionaría buena parte de los conceptos fundamentales de la ciencia. Los casos recientes de supuestos “viajeros en el tiempo” que aparecen fuera de lugar son todos hasta ahora explicables como resultado de la relentless pursuit of the past images of something that looks contemporary. A century ago people could not hear it went down the street with devices in the ears. A century later, hearing aids are tiny, but started using cell phones. In the world of fashion is spinning technology.
- Why do you care about these issues, Kentaro? Are they entertaining?
"They are fabulous, you can not say that they are boring. Address seriously absurd possibilities before morning coffee, lunch critically assess before, far from being crazy is a fun exercise of reason.
0 comments:
Post a Comment